6 May 2022 | ESG

SFDR Article 6, 8 and 9 products explained. What do the classifications mean?  

Written by Ben Goble

The EU has started to implement the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), which sets out rules for classifying and reporting on sustainability and ESG factors in investments. 

Forming part of the EU Financing Sustainable Growth Action Plan, SFDR was established with the following goals:  

  • Encourage investment in projects with a social or environmental objective 
  • standardise the reporting of sustainability traits, enhancing comparability between financial products 
  • increasing transparency of financial products with respect to sustainability 
  • prevent greenwashing – the act of presenting a financial product as more environmentally sound than it actually is, in an attempt to capitalise on the growing demand for these products 

SFDR regulation applies to all financial market participants (FMPs) and financial advisors (FAs) in the EU, FMPs with EU shareholders, and those marketing themselves in the EU, setting out clear disclosure requirements when it comes to ESG considerations. 

Since March 2021, FMPs managing funds and FAs providing advice have been required to make disclosures regarding how they integrate sustainability risks into investment decision making as well as the adverse sustainability impacts of the funds’ investments.  

SFDR requires that UCITS and AIFMs must designate investment products as an Article 6, 8 or 9 fund, and make certain disclosures in-keeping with this choice. These pre-contractual disclosures are required to ensure that investors have greater transparency before entering an investment product or accepting advice.  

One disclosure is a fund’s sustainability risk, which is the risk of an environmental, social or governance event that could cause an actual or a potential material negative impact on the value of the investment. Sustainability risk is required under all fund types to varying degrees.  

Read on to find out the characteristics that define SFDR Article 6, 8 and 9 products and what these latest developments mean for asset managers.  

What is an Article 6 product under SFDR? 

Article 6 is the default classification for funds, and the one most appropriate for those with no ESG focus. This means funds that neither have a sustainable investment objective, nor do they embrace investment in assets with environmental or social benefits.  

In this classification, incorporation of sustainability risks into investment decision making and the impact of sustainability risks on fund returns must be described in the fund's prospectus (AIF) or Private Placement Memorandum (PPM). Where a fund manager does not consider sustainability risk in the decision-making process, the disclosure should explain why under the principle comply or explain 

For Article 6 products there is also a requirement to publish a Principle Adverse Impact (PAI) statement or explain the choice not to. Financial market participants employing more than 500 staff are required to publish PAI statement. The PAI is a disclosure by the firm on possible harm that investment decisions may have on sustainability factors relating to environmental, social and employee matters, respect for human rights, anti‐ corruption and anti‐ bribery matters. 

What are Article 8 and 9 funds under SFDR? 

Unlike Article 6, Article 8 and 9 products are both considered to be sustainable, but with distinct differences. Under SFDR, funds promoted as ESG are required to classify as being either an Article 8 or 9 product, depending on whether they meet the criteria for either classification, with Article 9 products subject to the most stringent requirements. In both cases, products must also meet the Article 6 disclosure requirements.  

Article 8 products 

Under SFDR, Article 8 products promote investments or projects with positive environment or social characteristics and with good governance principles, alongside other non-ESG traits. Such promotion could include screening out certain environmental and socially harmful investments or considering ESG ratings when making investment decisions. If the investment product has a benchmark, the FMP must disclose whether the benchmark is consistent with the product’s promoted characteristics.  

While sustainable investment is not an objective of the product, it remains an aspect of the investment process. Article 8 products need to disclose the degree (if any) to which they invest in environmentally sustainable investments or in investments with a social objective, as set out by EU Taxonomy regulations. 

Article 9 products 

Article 9 covers products that target a sustainable investment primary objective. A sustainable investment is an economic activity that contributes to an environmental or social objective. Products must comply with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle which means proving that the product does not in any way significantly harm any of the EU Taxonomy objectives. A benchmark index which aligns with the fund objective must also be chosen. The benchmark will then be used to measure achievement of the fund's sustainable investment objective.  

What does this all mean for asset managers? 

For firms that operate in the EU to be able to market investments as Article 8 or 9, they will need to review the whole lifecycle of products, from the initial product development and marketing, through to monitoring and reporting, updating policies and processes accordingly.  

It is also important that firms develop processes to gather and store relevant data and information, to comply with the disclosure requirements of the respective articles. 

Finally, there is a need to implement a risk management policy and framework that covers ESG and SFDR within the business, ensuring that this is updated to reflect ever-evolving sustainability reporting requirements, and that risk metrics are reviewed regularly at the fund and investment level.  

For more information on complying with SFDR disclosures and general ESG data requirements, head to www.landytech.com/for-asset-managers.  

Related Content

Top trends driving the ESG reporting agenda in 2022
26 May 2022 | ESG

4 top trends driving the ESG reporting agenda in 2022

Interest in ESG has increased exponentially in recent years and there has been no sign of slowing in 2022, so far. But it is not just inflows to ESG funds that has been increasing. As policymakers turn their attention to environmental, social, and...

Related content

26 May 2022 | Blog

4 top trends driving the ESG reporting agenda in 2022
Inflows into ESG funds have increased exponentially in recent years, but what is shaping the ESG agenda for asset managers?
Read blog

6 May 2022 | Blog

SFDR Article 6, 8 and 9 products explained. What do the classifications mean?
In this article we dissect what is meant by SFDR Articles 6,8 & 9 and the implications for asset managers.
Read blog

19 Apr 2022 | Blog

Why investment reporting needs to change

Across the investment management spectrum, the need for a radically different approach to investment reporting has never been greater.  

In this shifting landscape, implementing a data-driven, agile approach to investment reporting can help asset and wealth managers get back ahead of the game. 

Read blog

15 Apr 2022 | Webinar

Risk management: What do allocators expect?
Watch as our expert panel discuss the best practices in risk management and what asset managers need to ensure they can attract institutional capital, at a time of increased market volatility and increasing allocator expectations.
Watch now

29 Mar 2022 | Blog

The best practices in investment risk management you need to follow in 2022

For risk management, the ability to demonstrate extensive expertise alongside a deep understanding of the investment side of the business is crucial. But what best practices do firms need to follow to achieve an institutional-level standard of risk management? 

Read blog

23 Mar 2022 | Whitepaper

Risk management: What do allocators expect?

An in-depth guide to risk management featuring insights from asset management and due diligence professionals.


Download now

10 Mar 2022 | Blog

Why cloud solutions are the future of performance and risk analytics
The need to manage large volumes of data and perform complex calculations at speed have left many firms’ legacy systems and outdated technology struggling to keep up.  It’s time to take to the cloud. 
Read blog

11 Jan 2022 | Blog

The cost of meeting allocators' risk management expectations for asset managers

Implementing a fit-for-purpose risk management and reporting function is expensive. But for asset managers, the cost of sub-standard risk capabilities is even higher.

Read blog

16 Dec 2021 | Case Study

Landytech Helps Hedge Fund Achieve Substantial Cost Savings

After a recommendation from a market peer, a UK-based multi-strategy hedge fund approached Landytech for a managed solution that would provide expert risk management support, as establishing and maintaining this function inhouse would come at significant cost. Read the full case study here.

Read case study

15 Dec 2021 | Blog

The 5 must-have capabilities for managing the risk function in-house

So you know you need a robust, institutional-grade risk management capability to attract investor allocations and meet clients’ ongoing demands. But what does a fit-for-purpose risk management and reporting function entail in practice?

Read blog

7 Dec 2021 | Blog

4 things asset managers should look for in a risk management provider

Faced with demanding investor and regulatory expectations, asset managers are increasingly turning to third-party risk management providers.

Read blog

24 Nov 2021 | Case Study

Equity Manager Transforms Risk Management and Institutional Client Reporting Process with Sesame

Skerryvore Asset Management needed a sophisticated risk management and data analysis platform to meet the exacting due diligence requirements of institutional investors and so help grow its business. Read the full case study here.

Read case study

18 Nov 2021 | Whitepaper

The True Cost of Risk for Asset Managers

Comprehensive risk management capabilities are an integral and growing ingredient in asset manager success. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the value a strong risk management infrastructure and team bring has moved to the fore. Download our whitepaper examining the true cost of risk for asset managers.

Download now